George Wills

Barrister

George’s practice focuses on criminal defence and regulatory prosecutions.

In respect of criminal defence, George enjoys a wide practice in general crime both as a led junior and as counsel alone. He is as at home dealing with cases with high volumes of witnesses and papers as he is cases involving vulnerable defendants and/or prosecution witnesses.

George deals with road traffic offences of all kinds. He has successfully argued unusual ‘special reasons’ and ‘exceptional hardship’ on a number of occasions including in the defence of a United States Air force pilot based in the UK and other very high profile clients.

Experienced in a range of regulatory work, including countless cases arising out of Housing and Planning Enforcement and associated Proceeds of Crime Proceedings. He is also accustomed with the Unfair Consumer Trading Regulations and breaches of Trading Standards’ regulations.

George has been involved in cases before the Nursing and Midwifery Council and Association of Chartered Certified Accountants dealing with anything from Interim Orders to Fitness to Practice hearings. Before the NMC he has dealt with a large number of registration appeals also.

George completed a secondment followed by further instruction by the Financial Conduct Authority working on a dual stream criminal and regulatory investigation into a firm and specific individuals accused of various breaches of AML requirements and the FCA Handbook.

He was also previously instructed as Junior Counsel to the Grenfell Tower Fire Public Inquiry.

George accepts instructions via Direct Access.

Professional Memberships

Middle Temple Young Barristers’ Association
Criminal Bar Association
Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales

R v AT – Led junior for first Defendant charged with Murder and Violent Disorder.
R v CW – Aggravated Burglary, Robbery, s.20 GBH and Possession of a Disguised Firearm.
R v LP et al – 6-handed Violent Disorder involving an off-duty Police Officer. This case involved the analysis of complex and lengthy video evidence.
R v PW – Importation of Firearms and associated Customs offences.
R v ML and another – Led Junior in child cruelty case involving allegations made by 7 children. Required careful consideration of complex family court records and third part material.
R v AL – Robbery and Blackmail. The Blackmail Charge was the subject of a successful application to dismiss. The Crown ultimately accepted a plea to simple theft and the matter resolved in a non-custodial sentence.
R v PP and another – Represented the Defendant in a production of cannabis case. Involved dealing with a referral through the National Referral Mechanism.
R v RH – Led Junior in case involving allegations of assault by penetration of a 4 year old by a 17 year old. The Crown offered no evidence following preparation of robust application to exclude the ABE evidence in the case.
R v MD – Represented the Defendant in a case which led to POCA proceedings centered on Bitcoin the Defendant was alleged to have.
TSL v R – Represented the Appellant in a successful appeal from the Youth Court against a conviction for GBH on a Police Officer.
R v LS and another – Kidnap charge dismissed following successful half-time submission
R v JH an another – Led Junior in a case involving Conspiracy to Possession a Firearm and Ammunitions and Large Scale Conspiracy to Supply Class A drugs.
R v LM – Successfully secured a reduction in sentence in a case involving serious allegations of controlling and coercive behaviour, drug driving and possession of an offensive weapon.
R v SI – Represented man of good character who was charged with the theft of a high-value watch. Defendant acquitted after trial.
R v AH – Following an actus reus hearing as a result of the Defendant being found unfit the Defendant was found not to have been in possession of a bladed article.
R v CL – Represented the Defendant who was acquitted after trial of racially aggravated assault x 2 and racially aggravated criminal damage.

Sexual Offences

R v ODA – Represented a healthcare professional charged with sexual assault on a patient. The Jury found him not guilty after trial.
R v JM – Secured suspended sentence for Defendant charged with sexual communications with a child.
R v DU – Instructed to represent Defendant charged with Supply Class A drugs and sexual activity in the presence of a child.
R v EE – Instructed to represent Defendant charged with rape.
R v LP – Instructed to represent Defendant charged with assault by penetration.
R v PB – Instructed to represent Defendant charged with sexual activity with a child.

Road Traffic Offences

R v KP - Represented the Defendant in a complex exceptional hardship application involving multiple heads of argument. The argument was successful and the Defendant avoided disqualification.
R v GW - George successful made representations at Court to secure the dismissal of charges of speeding and failing to provide a specimen.
R v SB - Successfully defended the Defendant charged with using a mobile phone while driving.
R v THM - NG verdict recorded in respect of charge of Dangerous Driving (at a Police Officer) after prosecution persuaded to offer no evidence.
R v RW - Defendant charged with Dangerous Driving described by the Judge as “possibly the worst thing I’ve ever witnessed”.
Represented US Airforce pilot based in the UK for driving offences. Successfully argued exceptional hardship on the basis of his military duties.
Represented D charged with s172 offence. Successfully argued the notice hadn’t been properly served securing not guilty verdict for the Defendant.
Multiple cases involving causing serious injury by dangerous driving.

Town and County Planning Act & HMO Cases

LBS v DB and SS – Case concerned the alleged laundering of the proceeds of fraudulent building work.
LBS v SA – Complex POCA proceedings arising out of a Town and Country Planning Act prosecution involving assets in excess of £1 million.
LBS v TH – Proceedings involving multiple charges arising out of the Housing Act, Management of Houses in Multiple Occupation Regulations and Town and County Planning Act.

Healthcare and Regulation

LBW v AE – Proceedings involving the prosecution of the Defendant under the Cosmetic Products Enforcement Regulations 2013 for the sale of illicit skin-lightening substances.
NMC v H - Fitness to Practice - Lack of competence case arising out of insufficient knowledge, judgement and skills to safely and effectively practice.
NMC v P - Interim Order.
NMC v A - Registration Appeal - ‘A' practiced while registration had lapsed.
NMC v B - Registration Appeal - ‘B’’s registration refused on basis of undeclared criminal convictions.
NMC v G - Registration Appeal - Failure to meet qualification requirements.
Multiple English Language Requirement Registration Appeals.

Financial Regulation

Re: TN – Appeared in an appeal to the Court of Appeal Criminal Division referred by the CCRC involving the miscalculation of the over-payment amount arising out of a criminal conviction for Benefit Fraud.
ACCA v G - failures to report suspicious activity under the Companies Act 2014 and multiple failures to cooperate with an investigation.
ACCA v H - serious deficiencies in audit work.
ACCA v M - serious deficiencies in audit work.

Trading Standards

Trading Standards v WP – Led junior in high value solar panel fraud being prosecuted by Trading Standards
Trading Standards (LBL) v SA Ltd and IT – Case concerned an Architect charged under the Unfair Consumer Trading Regulations for wrongful use of relevant accreditations from their professional bodies.
Thames Valley Police v Ors – Represented an interested party in successfully opposing the application of the Police for a Closure Order under s.136D Sexual Offence Act 2003 concerning a brothel.

Miscellaneous

Police v ML – Contested application for a closure order following allegations of violent disorder involving the wielding of a firearm at the relevant premises.